As we get older, the concept of sexual intercourse becomes more commonly discussed. Through adolescence, many teenagers strive to be more independent, inclining them to take part in risky behaviors and actions. Some individuals under the age of 18 believe that sexual intercourse should be frequent and normalized. However, there are several risks that occur when hastily partaking in sexual intercourse. 

 Intercourse should be participated with someone that is trusted and safe, and it should serve as a purpose for both emotional connection and vulnerability. Intercourse requires honest shared feelings between an individual and someone you are guaranteed to trust. Without emotional vulnerability, you will be left with guilt and will not guarantee any positive outcomes. As high school students, we are often surrounded by people who brag about losing their virginity and normalizing hook-up culture. People normalize hook-up culture due to how frequently sex is talked about. It is frequent to hear teens talk about the sexual activities they participated in. People under the age of 18 or minors in California cannot legally consent to sexual activity. In addition, California does not have a proper Romeo and Juliet law.

The Romeo and Juliet law means there are reduced penalties or rape charges for consensual sexual activity for couples close in age. Even with the state law, many still have sex, increasing their chances of potential risk factors. This law affects teenagers more so in terms of having the decision to participate in intercourse. In states where the Romeo and Juliet law applies, it gives teenagers the right to have sex with a partner who is close in age, without having to face the disciplinary actions of public indecency. Although we believe that these teenagers cannot consent to situations like these, given that their minds are still maturing and developing.

Part of the reason why teenagers have sex is due to peer pressure amongst their friends or believing that losing their virginity should happen at an earlier age. For instance, The National Institute of Health states, males who develop later in life are more motivated to assert sexual behavior, in comparison to those who develop early on in their teenage life. In most scenarios, high schoolers have sex to fit in and rush into intimacy because they believe they are emotionally mature and ready. In reality, most teenagers are not ready to have sexual intercourse, as it is risky, and their bodies are not fully developed. 

Emotional vulnerability should be prioritized when considering intercourse. Intercourse should be reserved for trust-building relationships where vulnerability is not weaponized post-intercourse. If not, intimacy becomes transactional rather than meaningful. One-night stands reduce partners to objects instead of prioritizing connection and emotional growth. While one person may have the intention of connecting with the other, that intention may not be reciprocated and would ruin the intimacy and overall relationship.

When considering whether intercourse should be normalized among younger people, it is important to remember that it should only be engaged in by consenting partners who are both physically and emotionally prepared for the experience. In certain situations, such as with minors or people who do not fully understand the potential consequences, intercourse can be risky and harmful. It is also important to acknowledge that every person has their own unique circumstances and may not be comfortable engaging in intercourse at all.

It is crucial to prioritize safety and consent when it comes to deciding if intercourse should be normalized. While it may be your own personal choice, considering the risks and whether or not your decision will impact your future should be a priority. Succumbing to peer pressure is unfortunately common, but engaging in intimate acts should be a personal choice, and the decision to participate must consider individual factors.